Monday, 31 August 2015

Christian Flood Victims Denied Aid Unless they Convert to Islam

Christian flood victims in Pakistan are being denied vital help unless they convert to Islam. They are citizens of Pakistan but the rescue programmes are run by the Muslim majority   - this is an example of sheer, blatant injustice.
If they don't want to convert, they have the alternative of becoming slaves. So that's all right then?  

Capture d’écran 2015-08-30 à 14.02.28

Wilson Chowdry, president of the British-Pakistani Christian Association, reports from the village of Kasur that more than sixty Christian families, whose homes or entire villages in some cases have been swept away by floods are living in make-shift tents, relying on handouts for food. There are many other villages where the same problem is found. The charity has very little in resources to give and is appealing for charitable donations so that it can give basic food and water to these people. Pakistani emergency services have told them they must convert, or have in some cases told them that they must sign contracts of lifelong unpaid servitude to Muslim landowners before they receive anything. Chowdry regrets that they did not get there a week earlier, when they might have saved some families from signing these slave contracts. But, faced with starvation, for themselves and their children, some have now made this evil bargain. The contracts should be overturned by a court, and declared illegal. Need we still point out that slavery is against the Universal Declaration of Human Rights?
Meanwhile the British government continues to gives Pakistan billions of £ in financial aid, and lefties waffle on about the cause of the floods being "global warming" - which, even if you believe in it, is the least of our problems. The big charity organizations are too eager to appear PC to say anything.

Write to your MPs, MEPs and local newspapers protesting and demand that something is done about this. Stop aid to Pakistan. Give the money directly to persecuted Christians. Impose sanctions until persecution of Christians stops. 
Spread the news on Facebook, Twitter and any other means possible.

To make a donation to the British-Pakistani Christian Association and help these desperate people please use this link:-

Sunday, 30 August 2015

"Big Ears" Demonstration Against Oxford City Council Bank Holiday Monday by STCP and Others

The posted image B-EARS.JPG

NHS Demands Young Mother Pay £700 Fine for Clerical Error

Tracy LE

Tracy, a nurse in Lincoln, says that her daughter has just been landed with a bill of £700 by the NHS, because she claimed free prescriptions and dental treatment while pregnant and shortly after giving birth.
Surely the law is that pregnant women and new mothers don't have to pay for prescriptions and dental treatment?  Yes, it is. Tracy's daughter is a social worker who has just had a baby and is on maternity leave. She should have been entitled to free medical care. But it seems that a midwife forgot to fill in some paperwork and tell her she needed to apply for a special card.
So despite having a legal RIGHT to this treatment, she got a shocking bill for £700. As well as the charges of £8.20 for each prescription, they slapped on a fine of £49 PER PRESCRIPTION, and topped it with a £200 charge for dental treatment.
The family is fuming and wondering who they can turn to to fight this.
It is bad enough that people in England have to pay prescription charges while people in Scotland and Wales don't.  If this young mother lived in Scotland, she would never have to pay for medicines, pregnant or not, and she would get more money allocated to her baby's health care. To be denied your legal entitlement because of a bureaucratic error, not your own fault, and then ruthlessly fined for it, is intolerable. The young mother is a British citizen, of British parents, a working tax-payer and law-abiding person, unlike many of those who impudently grab free treatment on the NHS every year at our expense. If she is forced to pay the fine, her child will share her hardship.
      Why didn't the pharmacies and the dentists who allowed her to claim free treatment, because she was obviously pregnant, warn her that she needed a card? Whoever sent that bill out should be sacked.

Friday, 28 August 2015

There is a War on Christians

URGENT message from Andrew White the Vicar of Baghdad, Iraq.

"Today ISIS is less than two miles away from the Christian community, and everybody is terrified of what is going to happen.
The islamist group (ISIS) just took over Quaragosh, the biggest Christian city in Iraq. There are hundreds of men, women and children that are being beheaded. The people are asking for prayers to be made on their behalf concerning the ongoing atrocity in their country. Please take one minute to pray for them. Pass the message across to all your contacts so that the prayer chain will not be broken. They asked for this special prayer. Please, ensure you pass across the prayer request to the body of Christ for fervent prayers offered on behalf of the brothers, sisters and children in Iraq. This is an urgent SOS. May God bless you."

Suggested prayer: Please, God, protect and save these Christians, and bring mercy, shame and repentance into the hearts of their oppressors. Amen."

And this is the news reported by ASLJ
ISIS just captured a new Syrian city, kidnapped Christians, and desecrated churches. Islamic jihadists are raping children and selling girls into sex slavery - the younger the girl, the higher the price.
It's a horror not witnessed in our lifetimes.
The Pope starkly called it a "third world war."
Christians are the target of jihadist genocide. But will we do something about it, or will we sit in silence?
As our brothers and sisters in Christ are raped, tortured, and killed, we MUST act.
At the ACLJ, we're deeply engaged in the fight for the persecuted Church, but we need your voice.
We're aggressively advocating through our offices in the region and on Capitol Hill. Key legislation adopting some of our recommendations is moving in Congress, but more must be done.
Be heard for the persecuted Church before it's too late.
Sign Our Urgent Petition: Stop ISIS's Genocide of Christians.
Jay Sekulow
ACLJ Chief Counsel

Contribute Now
Double Your Gift

Wednesday, 26 August 2015

More Damned Lies from Pink News

Never believe anything you read in Pink News. It exists to spread lies and stir up hatred and intolerance. It is written by fanatics who love to offer myths about homosexuals being oppressed and victimized. One typical myth is that of the Admiral Duncan pub bombing, supposedly an "anti-gay hate-crime."  Year after year they reverently commemorate this fallacy.

Admiral Duncan, Soho, W1 (7295077022).jpg

Let's look back at the real story - and the whole story.
In London in the Spring of 1999, there was a series of three unexplained bombings, carried out using home-made nail-bombs. The first took place on Sunday 17th April outside a supermarket in Brixton. It injured at least forty-five people, including a one-year-old boy who got a nail lodged in his brain. Dozens of victims got nails lodged in various parts of their bodies.

One week later, on Sunday 24th April, a similar bomb went off in Brick Lane in London’s East End. Seven people were severely injured although nobody this time was killed. Police started to assume that the crimes were racially motivated, because Brick Lane is an area full of Bangladeshi immigrants and restaurants. Brixton is also an area with a large immigrant population, many of them black people from the West Indies. Police issued statements saying they were assuming these attacks were racist and at this point the police got calls from several people calling themselves racist groups and claiming responsibility. These calls turned out to be hoaxes. It may even have been the far-Left ringing up and trying to smear someone.
On Saturday 30th April a third bombing took place, in Soho, an old area of central London close to Piccadilly Circus and Leicester Square. The target was a small, very old pub called The Admiral Duncan in Old Compton Street. Somebody handed a bag to the pub manager, and when he opened it at 6.30, the bomb went off. Three people were killed outright and about 65 others were injured.

The logical thing would be to assume that this attack was also racially motivated. Soho is sometimes known as London’s Chinatown, and Old Compton Street was one of the  first areas where you could find Greek and Italian shops and restaurants. A colourful, cosmopolitan area, in short. But somehow a rumour was started that the Admiral Duncan was a “gay” pub. Media sources, which are of course dominated by LGBT activists, seized on the bombing for their own ends and started to refer to Soho as the “heart of London’s gay community”. That’s ridiculous  - if anything, Soho has long been dominated by heterosexual clubs, shops and ladies-of-the-night. There is no “gay community” in London, there is just the usual sprinkling of homosexuals here and there, as in most big cities.

The Admiral Duncan was not a “gay pub”. It was not listed anywhere as being “gay” and it was used by a miscellaneous cross-section of London residents. At the time the bomb went off, it was full of heterosexual men and women. The three people killed by the nail bomb included Andrea Dykes, a woman aged 27, who was four months pregnant at the time, Could it have been her surname that sparked off a misunderstanding or a false report? “How many dykes did you say were killed? I said Dykes, not dykes…” The others killed were Nik Moore, aged 31, and John Light, 32, who died later in hospital. Andrea’s husband was among those seriously injured. Nik had been their friend and John had been the best man at their wedding.

 Image result for Andrea Dykes husband Julian

Andrea Dykes with her husband Julian  - not a dyke at all!

None of these victims was a homosexual and nor were most of the other people in the pub either. But the tiny handful who were seized this as an opportunity to put on some "gay" histrionics and act the victim. Very soon, they had succeeded in spreading a rumour that the whole attack was “homophobic” and the first two bombings were virtually forgotten.

After the Admiral Duncan explosion, police got a telephone call from a group calling themselves the “White Wolves” claiming responsibility. This also turned out to be a hoax as Copeland was not a member of  any group. Again the call could have come from lefties at the Daily Mirror or UAF trying to smear people. If so they failed as the media far preferred a “homophobia” story, and this version has been spread ever since.

In May 1999, police arrested and charged David Copeland, a 23-year-old engineer from Hampshire. He was allegedly a former member of a racist group   - who knows if this was true? It is the sort of story that the media love to spread. At the time of the bombings he was not a member of any group and acted alone. He certainly had a range of disturbed psychiatric symptoms. He was convicted on 30th June, only a month after his arrest, and gaoled for life, but while Copeland admitted to being a racist, he never admitted to any “homophobic” motive. He had no idea that the Admiral Duncan was supposed to be a "gay" pub. It emerged that he had committed the last bombing in haste, intending to do it on Sunday 1st May but bringing it forward because he heard that police had issued a description of a suspect. So, his choice of target was completely random.
According to Wikipedia and PukeNews the whole crime was a homophobic attack  - how strange then that only heterosexuals got killed!
Curious isn't it how when homo-fanatics carry out real bomb attacks on churches in Moscow, PukeNews doesn't take much interest.  But then, they prefer fantasy to reality.

Tuesday, 25 August 2015

Headington Road Scheme

Oxfordshire County Council was cunning to launch its latest road scheme for Headington in the middle of summer just when most people are busy outside or away on holiday so that they wouldn't be able to take part in the consultation. Builders of unpopular or illegal development schemes have long used the same tactics.

Image result for Headington Windmill Road

       On the face of it, the scheme is benign in seeking to provide a cycle lane in Windmill Road, but they are only doing so by dint of banning parking. The vast majority of the residents have nowhere else to park. Most of the houses were built without garages and the owners will have to pave over their gardens if they want to keep a car. And the narrowing of the pavements planned will be an inconvenience.The position of the HS3 bus stop on the Eastern side of the road near Linden Court has always been inconvenient. Those waiting for the number 10 bus need to have very small feet.
    The result of a no-parking policy will be, as their own plan, admits, to "improve traffic flow". But faster traffic will not make the road safer either for cyclists or for anybody else. At present, the narrowness of Windmill Road slows traffic down, and this makes it safer for cyclists, pedestrians and handicapped people. Wherever you get speedy traffic flow, somebody is bound to start demanding the installation of bloody awful speed bumps and a plethora of speed limit signs, "beware of school-children" signs etc etc
    The fact is that Windmill Road was just not designed as a major arterial road, and should not be designated as such on maps, There is room on other adjacent roads, such as Old Road, for cycle lanes, but only if green verges are removed, which is specifically against the Neighbourhood Plan. This is a tough decision, but in the last resort, I think the safety of cyclists along that major route ought to be the higher priority than grass verges.
     Of course a parking ban along any road is a nice little earner when it comes to handing out fines. Could that have crossed their minds?
  The County has much further-reaching schemes for banning all petrol-fuelled vehicles from the entire city in the near future, so this is only a marginal note in the great Roads saga.

Sunday, 23 August 2015

Online Trolls Hall of Shame (2) Chris Flegg

Watch out for this nasty specimen of the troll species who goes by the name of Chris Flegg. 
Yes, it rhymes with Clegg, dreg and smeg.

Chris Flegg

Mr Flegg specializes in online abuse, insults and death threats. He likes to barge into other people's conversations online and abruptly launch into abuse. He spits venom! His scatological language and foul temper match his picture and his name.
Just look at him  - isn't that the perfect picture of a bully?
In the Hall of Shame he deserves to stand right up there with Mr Derek Crawford Munn and the gang that bullied Brendan Eich.
Be warned  - block him, ban him and shun him. 
Funnily enough his Facebook page goes on a lot about the perils of pesticides. Pity there isn't a pesticide that's effective enough to keep this type of pest far away and out of sight or hearing.